Every few months, a new Instagram growth “hack” circulates through social media manager group chats, marketing newsletters, and the accounts of people who describe themselves as “digital strategists” in their bios.

Instagram’s chief, Adam Mosseri, took to his own Stories during his weekly Q&A to address the myth directly (that reposting feed content to Stories gives it a second wind of reach), and his answer was about as generous as platform executives get when dismantling popular misconceptions: the practice will not meaningfully increase your reach.

Feed posts hold a structural advantage because they remain permanently visible, surface in the Explore feed through recommendation, and reach people who are not yet your followers. Stories, by contrast, disappear after 24 hours and are only visible to your existing audience. Therefore, pushing a feed post into Stories is a redundancy strategy dressed up as amplification.

When asked about platform hacks more broadly, Mosseri acknowledged that some occasionally produce results, most do not, and that Instagram actively identifies the ones that do work and eliminates them. A candid admission that the platform is not a passive system waiting to be gamed, but an active environment where exploit-based growth tends to have a short shelf life.

Mosseri also disclosed that Instagram is actively debating whether to allow users to schedule Stories, a feature the platform has historically resisted because it values Stories as spontaneous, in-the-moment content.

Stories built their cultural identity on rawness and immediacy, the unpolished counterpart to the curated feed. Allowing scheduling would make the format more practical for professional publishers and small business owners managing content calendars, while potentially nudging the format toward the kind of polish that made feed posts feel effortful in the first place.

To learn more, click here.